Catalogue · Section 10 · Entry
Zeeshanahmad4/awesome_list_of_anti_detect_browsers_apps
NRND
Zeeshanahmad4/awesome_list_of_anti_detect_browsers_apps is a project catalogued in section 10 of this register. Commercial-browser listicle, unmaintained since 2024. It reads NRND — not recommended for new designs. It very probably still works; the register's position is that it is not where you should start, and the clause that produced that is printed further down this page.
https://github.com/Zeeshanahmad4/awesome_list_of_anti_detect_browsers_apps
The fields this state was derived from
| Field | Value at this printing |
|---|---|
| pushed_at | 2024-08-25 |
| archived | false |
| latest_release | — |
| license.spdx_id | null (none declared) |
| stargazers_count | 53 |
| http_status | 200 |
| fetched_at | 2026-08-14T09:12:00Z |
| endpoint | GET https://api.github.com/repos/Zeeshanahmad4/awesome_list_of_anti_detect_browsers_apps |
| rubric_edition | 2nd, in force since 2026-08-14 |
A live read does not change what is printed above it. The site records that you ran it; what GitHub returned is not kept. The printed state moves only when the register is swept and a new printing is issued. raw JSON
Why it reads NRND
pushed_at = 2024-08-25 — 719 days, inside the 365–1095 day NRND band.
Not Recommended for New Designs. Works; do not start here.
Under the superseded first edition
SEMI
NRND
pushed_at = 2024-08-25 — 719 days, inside the 180–1095 day SEMI band.
The rubric in force · The superseded first edition · Errata leaf
What Zeeshanahmad4/awesome_list_of_anti_detect_browsers_apps actually does
A listicle of commercial anti-detect browsers, of the kind that ranks well and ages badly, because a list of products with no check date cannot tell you which of them still exist.
What Zeeshanahmad4/awesome_list_of_anti_detect_browsers_apps's maintenance signals mean
pushed_at reads 2024-08-25 — 719 days, or about 2.0 years, before the field check, which places it inside the 365-to-1095-day band the rubric calls NRND.
NRND is borrowed intact from the electronic component catalogues, where it means Not Recommended for New Designs, and it is the most useful state in this register precisely because it is not a synonym for broken. The part is still in the catalogue. You can still buy it. If you are designing something new, do not design it in. Applied here: what this project does, it very likely still does. Starting a new build on it means inheriting a maintenance gap you did not create and cannot close.
No release was captured for this entry, which this register records as unknown rather than as none. The distinction matters more than it looks: a project with no tags and a project whose tags the sweep failed to read produce the same blank cell, and printing them as the same fact would be the register asserting something it has not measured.
Where Zeeshanahmad4/awesome_list_of_anti_detect_browsers_apps sits in this catalogue
Zeeshanahmad4/awesome_list_of_anti_detect_browsers_apps is filed in section 10, communities & competing registries, whose scope is this: Where the work is discussed, and the other lists covering this ground — listed with their own liveness fields, on the same rule as everything else. An entry sits in exactly one section here. Where a project could defensibly go in two, it is placed where a reader would look for it first rather than where it fits most tidily, and that is an editorial decision rather than a measured one.
Filed beside it in the same section: embeddinglayer/awesome-fingerprinting (ACTIVE), Nika-Proxy/awesome-tls-fingerprinting (ACTIVE), antidetect/list (NRND). Comparing an entry against its own section-mates is more informative than comparing it against the catalogue as a whole, because everything in a section is answering roughly the same question and the differences left over are the ones that matter.
Its licence field is empty, and this register treats that as a finding rather than a gap — see every entry here that declares no licence. Source you can read is not source you have been granted the right to use, modify or redistribute, and an absent licence file means exactly that absence and nothing friendlier. It is also grouped with everything else the rubric marks NRND.
What to settle before you adopt Zeeshanahmad4/awesome_list_of_anti_detect_browsers_apps
It has not been pushed to since 2024, and this register prints that rather than leaving you to guess. That gap is exactly what the maintenance state on this page is for.
Questions readers ask about Zeeshanahmad4/awesome_list_of_anti_detect_browsers_apps
Answered from this entry's own fields, at the field check printed above and at no other instant.
Is Zeeshanahmad4 anti-detect list still maintained?
At the 2026-08-14 field check this register read pushed_at as 2024-08-25 and the archive flag as false, and the rubric in force turned those into NRND. Not Recommended for New Designs. Works; do not start here. The clause that fired is printed on this page, so you can check the arithmetic rather than take the word.
What else in this registry does the job Zeeshanahmad4 anti-detect list does?
No substitution edge is declared for this entry, which means nobody has stated one rather than that none exists. The nearest comparison available is the rest of section 10, where everything is answering roughly the same question on the same printed fields.
What licence is Zeeshanahmad4 anti-detect list under?
None is declared. That is a finding, not a formatting problem: without a licence file there is no grant to use, modify or redistribute the code, however openly it is published. Every entry here in the same position is listed together for that reason.
Why did the state recorded for Zeeshanahmad4 anti-detect list change?
Because the rules changed, not because the world did. The same field data reads SEMI under the superseded first edition and NRND under the edition in force. Both derivations are printed on this page, and the entry appears on this printing's errata leaf with the superseded value struck rather than deleted.
The other lists in section 10 are catalogued here on the same rule as everything else, including their own licences and their own push dates, because a register that exempted its competitors would not be a register. Donut Browser is the tool the people who keep this one work on: an open-source anti-detect browser under AGPL-3.0, with a local REST API and MCP server on your own machine and no telemetry in it at all.
curl -fsSL https://donutbrowser.com/install.sh | sh
macOS (DMG, Homebrew cask donut), Windows (installer and portable), Linux (deb, rpm, AppImage, with APT and RPM repositories at repo.donutbrowser.com), and a Nix flake. Desktop only — there is no mobile build target. Ten shipped languages. Source, AGPL-3.0 · its own entry, judged by the same rubric · the keepers' disclosure.