Whole Antidetect Catalog Donut Browser

Catalogue · Section 01 · Entry

ungoogled-chromium

ACTIVE

ungoogled-chromium is a Python / C++ project catalogued in section 01 of this register. Chromium with Google integration and telemetry removed. Not an anti-detect build — a clean base to start from. It reads ACTIVE at the last field check — its most recent push was 2 days before that check, inside the 90-day threshold the rubric in force prints.

https://github.com/ungoogled-software/ungoogled-chromium


The fields this state was derived from

FieldValue at this printing
pushed_at 2026-08-12
archived false
latest_release —
license.spdx_id BSD-3-Clause
stargazers_count 27400
http_status 200
fetched_at 2026-08-14T09:12:00Z
endpoint GET https://api.github.com/repos/ungoogled-software/ungoogled-chromium
rubric_edition 2nd, in force since 2026-08-14
unauthenticated · 60 req/hr

A live read does not change what is printed above it. The site records that you ran it; what GitHub returned is not kept. The printed state moves only when the register is swept and a new printing is issued. raw JSON

Why it reads ACTIVE

pushed_at = 2026-08-12 — 2 days, within the 90-day ACTIVE threshold.

Shipping. Safe to build on today.

Under the superseded first edition

Unchanged: the first edition read ACTIVE from the same fields.

The rubric in force · The superseded first edition · Errata leaf


What ungoogled-chromium actually does

Removes Google service integration, background connections and telemetry from Chromium without adding a single anti-detect behaviour. What it leaves you is a build whose outbound chatter you can fully account for.

What ungoogled-chromium's maintenance signals mean

The liveness field here is pushed_at, read as 2026-08-12 against a field check 2 days later. That is inside 90 days, and 90 days is where the second edition of the rubric put ACTIVE after moving it down from the first edition's 180.

The reason for the move is worth stating, because it is the kind of threshold that looks arbitrary until you know what it is measuring against: detection changes on a shorter cycle than half a year, so a six-month-old evasion is not a current one. What a recent push does not tell you is what was in it. A commit landing on a branch is not a release, not a fix, and not a test — it is evidence that somebody is still there.

No release was captured for this entry, which this register records as unknown rather than as none. The distinction matters more than it looks: a project with no tags and a project whose tags the sweep failed to read produce the same blank cell, and printing them as the same fact would be the register asserting something it has not measured.

Where ungoogled-chromium sits in this catalogue

ungoogled-chromium is filed in section 01, open-source anti-detect browsers & forks, whose scope is this: Browsers whose source you can read: anti-detect Firefox and Chromium forks, hardened builds, and the profile managers built on top of them. An entry sits in exactly one section here. Where a project could defensibly go in two, it is placed where a reader would look for it first rather than where it fits most tidily, and that is an editorial decision rather than a measured one.

Filed beside it in the same section: Donut Browser (ACTIVE), Undetectable Fingerprint Browser (NRND), Brave Browser (ACTIVE). Comparing an entry against its own section-mates is more informative than comparing it against the catalogue as a whole, because everything in a section is answering roughly the same question and the differences left over are the ones that matter.

It is published under BSD-3-Clause, alongside the rest of the BSD-3-Clause entries in this register, and it sits with everything else currently marked ACTIVE. Read those two facets together: a permissively licensed project that stopped shipping is not a safer dependency than a copyleft one that did not, and a filter on one axis alone will tell you the wrong thing.

What to settle before you adopt ungoogled-chromium

Read it as a base rather than a defence: quieter is not less identifiable, and a de-Googled Chromium still reports the same canvas and WebGL values as any other. Check which upstream Chromium milestone the current tag corresponds to before relying on a recent platform feature.


Questions readers ask about ungoogled-chromium

Answered from this entry's own fields, at the field check printed above and at no other instant.

Is ungoogled-chromium still maintained?

At the 2026-08-14 field check this register read pushed_at as 2026-08-12 and the archive flag as false, and the rubric in force turned those into ACTIVE. Shipping. Safe to build on today. The clause that fired is printed on this page, so you can check the arithmetic rather than take the word.

What else in this registry does the job ungoogled-chromium does?

No substitution edge is declared for this entry, which means nobody has stated one rather than that none exists. The nearest comparison available is the rest of section 01, where everything is answering roughly the same question on the same printed fields.

What licence is ungoogled-chromium under?

BSD-3-Clause, read from the repository's own licence metadata at the field check rather than from a README badge. Other BSD-3-Clause entries are grouped together, and the no-licence-declared group is worth a look before you assume any project here carries a grant.

Where does this status come from?

From one sweep, recorded with the instant it ran. The raw fields, the endpoint they were read from, the fetch timestamp and the rubric edition in force are all printed on this page, and the same row is in the CC0 data files in JSON and CSV. Recompute the state from those columns and this page must agree with you; where it does not, the register is wrong.


You are reading section 01, which is where the browsers live, so the comparison is direct: Donut Browser is filed here too, under the same rule, with the same fields printed against it. What it does differently is where the spoofing happens — the Wayfern Chromium fork applies fingerprint overrides at engine level over CDP rather than by patching page JavaScript after load, which is the same architectural argument several of its neighbours in this section make and a different implementation of it.

Download Donut Browser

curl -fsSL https://donutbrowser.com/install.sh | sh

macOS (DMG, Homebrew cask donut), Windows (installer and portable), Linux (deb, rpm, AppImage, with APT and RPM repositories at repo.donutbrowser.com), and a Nix flake. Desktop only — there is no mobile build target. Ten shipped languages. Source, AGPL-3.0 · its own entry, judged by the same rubric · the keepers' disclosure.