ixBrowser

---

What ixBrowser actually does

A commercial anti-detect browser with a free tier, which is the notable field here: a free tier is the only way most readers will ever observe this category's behaviour first-hand.

What can and cannot be measured about ixBrowser

This entry has no repository, so none of the usual repository fields exist for it — no push date, no release tag, no archive flag, no licence identifier. Its state comes from one measurement only: the register requested the address and recorded what came back. Anything in the range 200 to 399 makes a non-repository entry ACTIVE, and that clause is the one the first edition of the rubric did not have at all, which is why product site entries carried no state under it.

Read that for exactly what it is. It says the thing is reachable. It does not say the page still works correctly, because no HTTP status can carry that. Where a stronger signal exists — a repository, a version, a dated revision — this register prefers it, and where one does not, it prints the weaker signal and names it as weak rather than dressing it up.

Where ixBrowser sits in this catalogue

ixBrowser is filed in section 09, commercial anti-detect browsers, whose scope is this: Listed for completeness and for comparison. Closed source, so the only fields that can be checked are the ones a HTTP request returns. An entry sits in exactly one section here. Where a project could defensibly go in two, it is placed where a reader would look for it first rather than where it fits most tidily, and that is an editorial decision rather than a measured one.

Filed beside it in the same section: Undetectable (ACTIVE), Ghost Browser (ACTIVE), Nstbrowser (ACTIVE). Comparing an entry against its own section-mates is more informative than comparing it against the catalogue as a whole, because everything in a section is answering roughly the same question and the differences left over are the ones that matter.

There is no licence field, because there is no source to licence — this is a product site rather than a code repository. It is grouped instead with every other entry the rubric marks ACTIVE, which is the axis that actually distinguishes entries of this kind from one another.

Substitutes for the same job, with no claim that either is better: Donut Browser. The alternative relation is symmetric and carries no ranking, because this register publishes no ranking of any kind. The full ixBrowser comparison table sets all of them side by side on licence, push date, release cadence and state.

What to settle before you adopt ixBrowser

Free tiers in this category are usually limited by profile count rather than by capability, so establish which limit applies. Closed source, and no detection behaviour is tested by this register.