Whole Antidetect Catalog Donut Browser

Catalogue · Section 08 · Entry

Chromium Privacy Sandbox

ACTIVE

Chromium Privacy Sandbox is a documentation catalogued in section 08 of this register. Platform direction on fingerprinting surfaces, from the engine with the largest share. At the last field check its address answered, which is the whole of what ACTIVE means for an entry with no repository behind it.

https://www.chromium.org/Home/chromium-privacy/privacy-sandbox/


The fields this state was derived from

FieldValue at this printing
http_status 200
fetched_at 2026-08-14T09:12:00Z
endpoint HEAD https://www.chromium.org/Home/chromium-privacy/privacy-sandbox/
rubric_edition 2nd, in force since 2026-08-14

This entry has no repository, so there is no API field a browser can re-read across origins. Its state comes from the register's own link check, printed above with the instant it was made.

Why it reads ACTIVE

No repository. The link check returned 200 at 2026-08-14T09:12:00Z, and 200–399 is ACTIVE for a non-repository entry.

Shipping. Safe to build on today.

Under the superseded first edition

UNSTATED ACTIVE
No repository. The first edition had no link liveness sweep and therefore no field to read here.

The rubric in force · The superseded first edition · Errata leaf


What Chromium Privacy Sandbox actually does

Platform direction on fingerprinting surfaces from the engine with the largest share, which makes it less a proposal document than a forecast of what will and will not be readable in a few releases' time.

What can and cannot be measured about Chromium Privacy Sandbox

This entry has no repository, so none of the usual repository fields exist for it — no push date, no release tag, no archive flag, no licence identifier. Its state comes from one measurement only: the register requested the address and recorded what came back. Anything in the range 200 to 399 makes a non-repository entry ACTIVE, and that clause is the one the first edition of the rubric did not have at all, which is why documentation entries carried no state under it.

Read that for exactly what it is. It says the thing is reachable. It does not say the documentation matches the shipped product, because no HTTP status can carry that. Where a stronger signal exists — a repository, a version, a dated revision — this register prefers it, and where one does not, it prints the weaker signal and names it as weak rather than dressing it up.

Where Chromium Privacy Sandbox sits in this catalogue

Chromium Privacy Sandbox is filed in section 08, datasets, leaderboards & public statistics, whose scope is this: Published distributions and population data. The only place in this catalogue where a percentage means anything, because someone else measured it and says how. An entry sits in exactly one section here. Where a project could defensibly go in two, it is placed where a reader would look for it first rather than where it fits most tidily, and that is an editorial decision rather than a measured one.

Filed beside it in the same section: HTTP Archive reports (ACTIVE), Web Almanac (ACTIVE). Comparing an entry against its own section-mates is more informative than comparing it against the catalogue as a whole, because everything in a section is answering roughly the same question and the differences left over are the ones that matter.

There is no licence field, because there is no source to licence — this is a documentation rather than a code repository. It is grouped instead with every other entry the rubric marks ACTIVE, which is the axis that actually distinguishes entries of this kind from one another.

What to settle before you adopt Chromium Privacy Sandbox

Announced direction and shipped behaviour diverge regularly here, and several components have been reshaped or withdrawn after announcement. Track what actually shipped rather than what was proposed.


Questions readers ask about Chromium Privacy Sandbox

Answered from this entry's own fields, at the field check printed above and at no other instant.

Is Chromium Privacy Sandbox still maintained?

Chromium Privacy Sandbox has no repository, so this register cannot answer that from a commit history. What it can do is request the address and record the result, which is what produced ACTIVE. Shipping. Safe to build on today.

What else in this registry does the job Chromium Privacy Sandbox does?

No substitution edge is declared for this entry, which means nobody has stated one rather than that none exists. The nearest comparison available is the rest of section 08, where everything is answering roughly the same question on the same printed fields.

What licence is Chromium Privacy Sandbox under?

The question does not apply — Chromium Privacy Sandbox is a documentation rather than source code, so this register records the licence field as not applicable rather than inventing one. Terms of use, where they exist, are the publisher's to state at the address above.

Why did the state recorded for Chromium Privacy Sandbox change?

Because the rules changed, not because the world did. The same field data reads UNSTATED under the superseded first edition and ACTIVE under the edition in force. Both derivations are printed on this page, and the entry appears on this printing's errata leaf with the superseded value struck rather than deleted.


Every dataset in section 08 exists because someone published their population and their method. This register publishes no population of tools, because it has tested none, and the population on its browser sheet comes with its size printed beside every share. Donut Browser is held to the same standard by the same people: open source under AGPL-3.0, no telemetry of any kind, and no claim in its favour on this site that is not a field you can re-fetch yourself.

Download Donut Browser

curl -fsSL https://donutbrowser.com/install.sh | sh

macOS (DMG, Homebrew cask donut), Windows (installer and portable), Linux (deb, rpm, AppImage, with APT and RPM repositories at repo.donutbrowser.com), and a Nix flake. Desktop only — there is no mobile build target. Ten shipped languages. Source, AGPL-3.0 · its own entry, judged by the same rubric · the keepers' disclosure.