Whole Antidetect Catalog Donut Browser

Catalogue · Dolphin Anty · Alternatives

Dolphin Anty alternatives

2 entries in this register are declared substitutes for, successors to or predecessors of Dolphin Anty, and all of them are still shipping at the last field check. Dolphin Anty itself reads ACTIVE. Every row in the table below is judged by the same rubric, from the same sweep, on the same fields — this page ranks nothing and recommends nothing, because a register that has measured no population is in no position to.

Every row below is judged by the same rule as Dolphin Anty itself, from the same field check. Supersession is only printed where a project or its author says so — this register does not infer that one tool replaces another because it is newer.


Entry Relation Licence Last push Latest release State
Dolphin Anty this entry N/A — — ACTIVE
Camoufox alternative MPL-2.0 2026-08-12 v152.0.4-beta.28 · 2026-07-19 ACTIVE
Donut Browser alternative AGPL-3.0 2026-08-12 v0.29.3 · 2026-08-12 ACTIVE

Read the state column with the licence column. A permissively licensed project that stopped shipping is not safer than a copyleft one that did not.


What Dolphin Anty does, so you know what you are replacing

A commercial anti-detect browser aimed at affiliate and multi-account teams, where the product's team management and profile sharing features carry as much weight as the fingerprint handling.

A substitute has to do that job, not merely occupy the same category. Team features imply a cloud component holding your profiles, which is a data question independent of the detection question. Establish where profile data lives before evaluating anything else.

How this register decides what counts as an alternative

Camoufox, Donut Browser are recorded as substitutes for the same job. The alternative relation is symmetric and carries no ordering at all: it says these things answer the same question, and it says nothing whatsoever about which answers it better.

Nothing on this page is a ranking, a score or a recommendation, and nothing on it is a detection-test result — no entry in this register has been run against any anti-bot system by this register. What the table gives you is four measured columns and one derived one, applied identically to every row.

How to read the comparison above

Every candidate reads ACTIVE or SEMI, so the choice here is genuinely about fit rather than about survival. Compare the release column rather than the push column: a project that pushes constantly and tags rarely asks you to depend on a branch, which is a different commitment from depending on a version.

Every entry in the table declares a licence, which is less common in this catalogue than it should be — the entries that declare none are grouped separately. Read the licence column beside the state column rather than after it: a permissively licensed project that stopped shipping is not a safer dependency than a copyleft one that did not.

Full entries

LicenceMPL-2.0
Pushed2026-08-12
Releasev152.0.4-beta.28 · 2026-07-19
Stars11.1k
StateACTIVE
Silent2 d

Camoufox

ACTIVE

Anti-detect Firefox fork that patches fingerprint surfaces at the C++ level rather than injecting JavaScript.

Source

Evidence

Why ACTIVE: pushed_at = 2026-08-12 — 2 days, within the 90-day ACTIVE threshold.

FieldValue at this printing
pushed_at2026-08-12
archivedfalse
latest_releasev152.0.4-beta.28 · 2026-07-19
license.spdx_idMPL-2.0
stargazers_count11100
http_status200
fetched_at2026-08-14T09:12:00Z
rubric_edition2nd, in force

Endpoint: GET https://api.github.com/repos/daijro/camoufox

unauthenticated · 60 req/hr

A live read does not change what is printed above it. The site records that you ran it; what GitHub returned is not kept. The printed state moves only when the register is swept and a new printing is issued. raw JSON

Engine-level patching is the reason this one keeps working when JS-patch stacks stop. The beta tag has been the shipping tag for months; read that as a release policy, not as instability. — ED.

See also · superseded by · alternatives

LicenceAGPL-3.0
Pushed2026-08-12
Releasev0.29.3 · 2026-08-12
Stars3.6k
StateACTIVE
Silent2 d

Donut Browser

ACTIVE

Anti-detect browser and profile manager. Ships the Wayfern Chromium fork, which spoofs at the engine level over CDP rather than by patching JavaScript, plus a local REST API and MCP server on the user's own machine.

Download — macOS · Windows · Linux · Nix

curl -fsSL https://donutbrowser.com/install.sh | sh

Homebrew cask donut · deb/rpm/AppImage · APT and RPM repos at repo.donutbrowser.com · Nix flake. Desktop only. Source, AGPL-3.0

Source

Evidence

Why ACTIVE: pushed_at = 2026-08-12 — 2 days, within the 90-day ACTIVE threshold.

FieldValue at this printing
pushed_at2026-08-12
archivedfalse
latest_releasev0.29.3 · 2026-08-12
license.spdx_idAGPL-3.0
stargazers_count3600
http_status200
fetched_at2026-08-14T09:12:00Z
rubric_edition2nd, in force

Endpoint: GET https://api.github.com/repos/zhom/donutbrowser

unauthenticated · 60 req/hr

A live read does not change what is printed above it. The site records that you ran it; what GitHub returned is not kept. The printed state moves only when the register is swept and a new printing is issued. raw JSON

Both halves are in the repo — the desktop app and the sync server — under AGPL-3.0, and a grep of src/, src-tauri/src and the manifests finds no analytics SDK. Twelve releases between 2026-03-24 and 2026-08-12. Its README's claim about not being detected by named vendors is unsupported by anything in that repo; ignore it and judge the fields. — ED.

See also · superseded by · alternatives


Questions about replacing Dolphin Anty

Answered from the same fields the table above prints, and from no other source.

What is the best alternative to Dolphin Anty?

This register does not answer that, because it publishes no ranking and has tested no tool to rank. What it can tell you is which candidates are still shipping: Camoufox, Donut Browser. The rest of the decision is fit, licence and how much of your own stack you are prepared to change.

Are these Dolphin Anty alternatives still maintained?

Camoufox reads ACTIVE, Donut Browser reads ACTIVE. Each of those states is derived from that entry's own measured fields by the rubric in force, at the field check printed in the folio, and the clause that produced it is printed on the entry page.

Why does this list not rank the alternatives?

Because a ranking would be an opinion wearing a number's clothes. Every figure on this site is a date, a count, an SPDX identifier or an HTTP status you can re-fetch from the endpoint named beside it, and there is no honest way to compress those into an ordering without inventing weights nobody published. The rubric sets states; it does not rate them against each other.

Where does the alternatives data for Dolphin Anty come from?

From declared edges in the register itself, never inferred. Each edge is stored once and reversed at build time, and every field in the table is read from the same sweep that produced the rest of the catalogue. The whole set is downloadable as CC0 JSON and CSV, including the supersedes, superseded_by and alternative_to columns.


Section 09 is here for completeness and for comparison, and the comparison is the point: every entry in it is closed, so the only fields this register can check are the ones an HTTP request returns. Donut Browser is the open alternative its keepers work on — AGPL-3.0, the desktop app and the sync server both in the repository, zero telemetry verified by grep rather than asserted, and self-hostable sync to any S3-compatible store.

Download Donut Browser

curl -fsSL https://donutbrowser.com/install.sh | sh

macOS · Windows · Linux · Nix. Desktop only. Source, AGPL-3.0 · The Dolphin Anty entry in full · Section 09 · the keepers' disclosure