This register records exactly one declared alternative to BrowserForge: fingerprint-suite (Apify), which reads ACTIVE at the last field check. BrowserForge itself reads SEMI. Every row in the table below is judged by the same rubric, from the same sweep, on the same fields — this page ranks nothing and recommends nothing, because a register that has measured no population is in no position to.
Every row below is judged by the same rule as BrowserForge itself, from the
same field check. Supersession is only printed where a project or its
author says so — this register does not infer that one tool replaces
another because it is newer.
Read the state column with the licence column. A permissively licensed
project that stopped shipping is not safer than a copyleft one that did
not.
What BrowserForge does, so you know what you are replacing
Generates header sets and fingerprints that are internally consistent — a user agent, its client hints, its accept-language and its screen metrics agreeing — instead of sampling each field independently.
A substitute has to do that job, not merely occupy the same category. Consistency is generated from a distribution that has its own age, so an old distribution produces coherent but dated devices. Check what browser versions the bundled data covers before you rely on the output looking current.
How this register decides what counts as an alternative
fingerprint-suite (Apify) is recorded as a substitute for the same job. The alternative relation is symmetric and carries no ordering at all: it says these things answer the same question, and it says nothing whatsoever about which answers it better.
Nothing on this page is a ranking, a score or a recommendation, and nothing on it is a detection-test result — no entry in this register has been run against any anti-bot system by this register. What the table gives you is four measured columns and one derived one, applied identically to every row.
How to read the comparison above
Every candidate reads ACTIVE or SEMI, so the choice here is genuinely about fit rather than about survival. Compare the release column rather than the push column: a project that pushes constantly and tags rarely asks you to depend on a branch, which is a different commitment from depending on a version.
Every entry in the table declares a licence, which is less common in this catalogue than it should be — the entries that declare none are grouped separately. Read the licence column beside the state column rather than after it: a permissively licensed project that stopped shipping is not a safer dependency than a copyleft one that did not.
Why ACTIVE: pushed_at = 2026-08-06 — 8 days, within the 90-day ACTIVE threshold.
Field
Value at this printing
pushed_at
2026-08-06
archived
false
latest_release
v2.1.88 · 2026-08-05
license.spdx_id
Apache-2.0
stargazers_count
2600
http_status
200
fetched_at
2026-08-14T09:12:00Z
rubric_edition
2nd, in force
Endpoint: GET https://api.github.com/repos/apify/fingerprint-suite
unauthenticated · 60 req/hr
A live read does not change what is printed above it. The site records that you ran it; what GitHub returned is not kept. The printed state moves only when the register is swept and a new printing is issued. raw JSON
Answered from the same fields the table above prints, and from no other source.
What is the best alternative to BrowserForge?
This register does not answer that, because it publishes no ranking and has tested no tool to rank. What it can tell you is which candidates are still shipping: fingerprint-suite (Apify). The rest of the decision is fit, licence and how much of your own stack you are prepared to change.
Are these BrowserForge alternatives still maintained?
fingerprint-suite (Apify) reads ACTIVE. Each of those states is derived from that entry's own measured fields by the rubric in force, at the field check printed in the folio, and the clause that produced it is printed on the entry page.
Why does this list not rank the alternatives?
Because a ranking would be an opinion wearing a number's clothes. Every figure on this site is a date, a count, an SPDX identifier or an HTTP status you can re-fetch from the endpoint named beside it, and there is no honest way to compress those into an ordering without inventing weights nobody published. The rubric sets states; it does not rate them against each other.
Where does the alternatives data for BrowserForge come from?
From declared edges in the register itself, never inferred. Each edge is stored once and reversed at build time, and every field in the table is read from the same sweep that produced the rest of the catalogue. The whole set is downloadable as CC0 JSON and CSV, including the supersedes, superseded_by and alternative_to columns.
Everything in section 02 is a patch applied to somebody else's automation stack, which means every one of them inherits that stack's release cadence and breaks on its own schedule. Donut Browser starts from the other end: the fingerprint handling is in the browser it ships rather than in a layer bolted onto a driver, and the local REST API and MCP server mean automation talks to it directly instead of through a patched client library.